ArticleBMC cancer2025
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the M.D. Anderson symptom Inventory-Multiple Myeloma Module: a translation and validation study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A Latent profile and network intervention analysis of psychosomatic symptoms in lung cancer immunotherapy patients.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe reliability of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory-Multiple Myeloma Module (MDASI-MM) was evaluated through its Chinese translation among Chinese patients with multiple myeloma.
methodsThe MDASI-MM scale underwent translation into Chinese following Brislin's two-way translation paradigm, incorporating ortho-translation, back-translation, pre-surveying, and cultural adaptation. The scale's validity and reliability were assessed using a sample of five hundred multiple myeloma patients from three tertiary general hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China, selected through convenience sampling based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics provided demographic information, while item analysis evaluated scale components. The scale's validity was assessed through content, construct, discriminant, convergent, and criterion validity analyses. Reliability was evaluated using internal consistency and split-half reliability measures, while responsiveness was assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
resultsThe Chinese version of the MDASI-MM scale consists of 26 items, including 13 core symptom items, seven multiple myeloma-specific symptom items, and six interference items. The item-level content validity index ranges from 0.889 to 1.000, the scale-level content validity index/universal agreement is 0.846, and the scale-level content validity index/average is 0.983. Validated factor analysis showed good model fit with χ
conclusionsThe Chinese version of the MDASI-MM scale demonstrates robust validity and reliability for evaluating clinical features in Chinese patients with multiple myeloma. This comprehensive symptom assessment tool enables healthcare professionals to examine disease characteristics thoroughly, providing a foundation for developing targeted and effective symptom management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.