Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200209›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroid injection for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zifeng Ye, Yiwei Yuan, Gaoyan Kuang, Liguo Qiu, Xuyi Tan, Zhi Wen, Min Lu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Diagnosis and Management of Common Tendinopathies.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zifeng YeHunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China.
Yiwei YuanHunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China.
Gaoyan KuangThe First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China.
Liguo QiuHunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China.
Xuyi TanAffiliated Hospital of Hunan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410006, China.
Zhi WenHunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, China.
Min LuThe First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China. lumin6563@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82174414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma injection into corticosteroid injection in the treatment of tendinopathy.

methodsWe searched PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and Web of Science to identify randomized controlled trials on the PRP injection versus CS injection in treatment of tendinopathy.The meta-analysis was performed using the Revman 5.4 software.

resultWe found 27 RCT studies with a total of 1779 patients enrolled. 8 rotator cuff injuries, 7 humeral external epicondylitis, 10 plantar fasciitis, and 2 tenosynovitis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there were no significant group differences in the results of patients with rotator cuff injury comparing the pain visual analog scale score and functional measures at 1 month after receiving injection treatment. After three months of receiving PRP treatment, the VAS scores showed greater improvement compared to the CS group(OR = -1.64,95%CI [-2.97,-0.31],P = 0.02), while there was no statistically significant difference in shoulder joint function between the two groups at the 3-6 month post-treatment mark. Patients with plantar fasciitis showed no significant differences in VAS and AOFAS scores after receiving PRP or CS injections at 1 and 3 months. However, at the 6-month mark, the PRP group demonstrated significantly better VAS and AOFAS scores compared to the CS group(OR = -1.41,95%CI [-1.88,-0.44],P < 0.00001; OR = 7.19,95%CI [2.41,11.91],P = 0.003). 1 month after CS injection in patients with tenosynovitis, the VAS score was lower than that of the PRP group; patients with elbow epicondylitis had better improved upper limb function rating scale scores 1 month after CS injection compared to the PRP group. In patients with tenosynovitis, the VAS scores were superior to the CS group six months after PRP treatment(OR = -0.72,95%CI [-1.04,-0.40],P < 0.00001); similarly, patients with lateral epicondylitis exhibited better VAS, DASH scores than the CS group three and twelve months post-PRP treatment(OR = -9.76,95%CI [-10.89,-8.63],P = 0.0002; OR = -0.97,95%CI [-1.87,-0.06],P < 0.0001; OR = -18.03,95%CI [-31.61,-4.46],P = 0.009).

conclusionPRP can effectively improve pain and functional impairment in patients with tendinopathy, and its mid-term efficacy is superior to that of corticosteroids. However, the long-term efficacy remains to be further clinically verified.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesPlatelet-Rich PlasmaTendinopathyHumansInjectionsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesCorticosteroidMeta-analysisPlatelet-rich plasmaSystematic reviewTendinopathies

Identifiers

PMID40200209
PMCPMC11980122

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.