Evidence mapPaperPMID 40200266Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025

Evaluation of routine preoperative testing practices in Sudanese public hospitals 2024: a multicenter prospective study.

Alaelddin Mohammed, Eltayeb Abdalla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alaelddin MohammedNeelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Eltayeb AbdallaMedstat Research Center, Khartoum, Sudan. eltayebge88@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe practice of routine preoperative testing is common in clinical settings despite the presence of regulatory guidelines, straining patients financially and further delaying delivery of care. This study aimed to assess the practice of routine preoperative investigations and compliance with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for preoperative investigations in Sudan.

methodsA prospective multicenter study was conducted in the main public hospitals at Atbara, Shendi, and Port-Sudan in January 2024; we prospectively studied 90 adults, sampled by covering all consecutive patients who underwent elective operations during the study period. Data were collected during the preanesthetic check-up and evaluated by senior clinicians for compliance with the NICE guidelines.

resultsThe study included 39 females (43%) and 51 males (56%), with a mean age of 38 ± 14 years. Among the 90 patients, 89 (99%) underwent at least one unnecessary investigation. Overall, out of 586 requested investigations preoperatively, 312 (53.2%) were unnecessary according to the NICE guidelines. The predictors of requesting unnecessary investigations were ASA status (p value 0.020) and surgery grade (< 0.001).

conclusionThis study reported significant overutilization of preoperative testing in Sudanese public hospitals. To address this issue, it is crucial to acknowledge widely recognized guidelines, raise clinicians' awareness of them and monitor their implementation.

Indexed as

ComplianceNICE GuidelinesPreoperative investigationsRoutine testingUnnecessary investigations

Identifiers

PMID40200266
PMCPMC11980336

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.