Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200280›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2025

The dynamics of chemoattractant receptors redistribution in the electrotaxis of 3T3 fibroblasts.

Jagoda Gorzkowska, Wiktoria Kozak, Sylwia Bobis-Wozowicz, Ivan Cherepashuk, Zbigniew Madeja, Sławomir Lasota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Macrophages sense and follow physiologically relevant KCell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jagoda Gorzkowska *Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Department of Cell Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Wiktoria KozakFaculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Department of Cell Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Sylwia Bobis-WozowiczFaculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Department of Cell Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Ivan CherepashukFaculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Department of Cell Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Zbigniew MadejaFaculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Department of Cell Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, 30-387, Poland.
Sławomir Lasota *Faculty of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Biotechnology, Department of Cell Biology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, Kraków, 30-387, Poland. slawomir.lasota@uj.edu.pl.

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2018/31/B/NZ3/01750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrotaxis, the directed cell movement in direct current electric field (dcEF), is crucial for wound healing and development. We recently proposed a biphasic electrotaxis mechanism, where an initial rapid response is driven by ionic mechanisms, while redistribution of membrane components come into play during prolonged exposure to dcEF.

methodsTo verify this hypothesis, we studied the redistribution dynamics of EGFR, PDGFRα/β, and TGFβR1 in dcEF. For this purpose, we utilized cells transfected with plasmids encoding fluorescently tagged receptors, which were exposed to dcEF in a custom-designed electrotactic chamber. Fluorescent images were captured using wide-field or TIRF microscopy, enabling precise quantitative analysis of receptor redistribution. Additionally, the functional significance of these selected receptors in electrotaxis was evaluated by silencing their expression using an siRNA library.

resultsAlthough EGFR moved immediately to cathode after dcEF application, maximum distribution asymmetry was reached after 30-40 min. This process was more efficient at higher dcEF intensities, specifically, asymmetry was greater at 3 V/cm compared to 1 V/cm, consistent with the biphasic mechanism observed only under the stronger dcEF. Additionally, redistribution was more effective under alkaline conditions and near the cell base, but decreased when glass was coated with poly-L-lysine, indicating electroosmosis as a key factor. Importantly, EGFR redistribution did not correlate with the rapid reaction of 3T3 cells to dcEF reversal, which occurred within 1-2 min, when receptor orientation was not yet reversed. PDGFRα exhibited similar but less marked cathodal redistribution, while PDGFRβ and TGFβR1 did not redistribute. siRNA knockdown experiments confirmed the importance of EGFR and ErbB4 in the electrotaxis. EGFR's role was largely ligand-independent, and it had a significant impact on the response of 3T3 cells to dcEF during the first hour of the experiment, but was not involved in the fastest response, which was Kir-dependent.

conclusionsOur study suggests that EGFR redistribution may play a role in the early stages and partially contribute to the long-term electrotaxis of 3T3 fibroblasts. However, this mechanism alone does not fully explain rapid responses to dcEF orientation changes indicating a more complex, multimodal mechanism of electrotaxis in these cells.

Indexed as

Fibroblasts3T3 CellsAnimalsCell MovementErbB ReceptorsMiceReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaErbB ReceptorsReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alphaReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betadcEFEGFRElectric fieldElectroosmosisElectrotaxisReceptor redistribution

Identifiers

PMID40200280
PMCPMC11980103

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.