ArticleBMC nursing2025
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of difficulty scale for nurses who care for patients with delirium in the intensive care unit.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of Chinese ICU nurses regarding ICU delirium: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Translation and psychometric validation of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale (MAIRS-MS) for Chinese medical students.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses experience many difficulties and challenges in caring for delirium patients. Identifying and measuring these difficulties experienced by nurses is critical for implementing precise interventions. We currently lack a standard tool for assessing the level of difficulty faced by ICU nurses in caring for delirium patients that fits the nursing context in China. This study aimed to translate the Difficulty Scale for Nurses who Care for Patients with Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit (DSNCPD-ICU) into Chinese (C-DSNCPD-ICU) and psychometrically validate the translated scale.
methodsThe English version of DSNCPD-ICU consisted of a main scale with eight factors and an additional scale of one factor. It was translated in strict accordance with Brislin's translation model to yield the Chinese versions. Using a convenience sampling method, 477 ICU nurses from ten general hospitals were recruited for online survey, which collected sociodemographic information, scores on C-DSNCPD-ICU and the Strain of Care for Delirium Index. Subsequent psychometric attributes of the C-DSNCPD-ICU were also tested by the validity and reliability.
resultsThere were 437 valid responses. The content validity index was calculated as 0.96. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale and each factor were 0.919 and 0.705-0.878, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis verified an eight-factor scale and an additional scale structure with cumulative variance contributions of the factors of 63.78% and 57.62%, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all data-model fits were acceptable.
conclusionsThe C-DSNCPD-ICU validated in this study showed satisfactory psychometric properties. This will help Chinese nurse managers to accurately assess the degree of difficulty and identify the causes of precise barriers in caring for patients with delirium. Using the scale, nurse managers can determine what kind of measures should be taken, including formulating effective and tailored educational programs and providing more resources to support nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.