Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200349›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025

Artificial intelligence, data sharing, and privacy for retinal imaging under Brazilian Data Protection Law.

Luis Filipe Nakayama, Lucas Zago Ribeiro, Fernando Korn Malerbi, Caio Saito Regatieri

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luis Filipe NakayamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, São Paulo Federal University, St., 821, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04023-062, Brazil. nakayama.luis@unifesp.br.
Lucas Zago RibeiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, São Paulo Federal University, St., 821, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04023-062, Brazil.
Fernando Korn MalerbiDepartment of Ophthalmology, São Paulo Federal University, St., 821, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04023-062, Brazil.
Caio Saito RegatieriDepartment of Ophthalmology, São Paulo Federal University, St., 821, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, 04023-062, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has revolutionized various medical domains, including radiology, intensive care, and ophthalmology. However, the increasing reliance on AI-driven systems raises concerns about bias, particularly when models are trained on non-representative data, leading to skewed outcomes that disproportionately affect minority groups. Addressing bias is essential for ensuring equitable healthcare, necessitating the development and validation of AI models within specific populations. This viewpoint paper explores the critical role of data in AI development, emphasizing the importance of creating representative datasets to mitigate disparities. It discusses the challenges of data bias, the need for local validation of AI algorithms, and the misconceptions surrounding retinal imaging in ophthalmology. Additionally, highlights the significance of publicly available datasets in research and education, particularly the underrepresentation of low- and middle-income countries in such datasets. The Brazilian General Data Protection Law is also examined, focusing on its implications for research and data sharing, including the legal and ethical measures required to safeguard data integrity and privacy. Finally, the manuscript underscores the importance of adhering to the FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) to enhance data usability and support responsible AI development in healthcare.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDatasetsRetinal imaging

Identifiers

PMID40200349
PMCPMC11980135

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.