Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40200378›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2025

Cross-sectional and longitudinal association of seven DNAm-based predictors with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.

Suet Mei Chew, Alexander Teumer, Pamela R Matías-García, Christian Gieger, Juliane Winckelmann, Karsten Suhre, Christian Herder, Wolfgang Rathmann, Annette Peters, Melanie Waldenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suet Mei ChewResearch Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany. c.suetmei@gmail.com.
Alexander TeumerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Pamela R Matías-GarcíaResearch Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Christian GiegerResearch Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Juliane WinckelmannInstitute of Neurogenomics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Karsten SuhreBioinformatics Core, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Education City, Doha, Qatar.
Christian HerderInstitute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfgang RathmannGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Neuherberg, Germany.
Annette PetersDepartment of Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Melanie WaldenbergerResearch Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany. waldenberger@helmholtz-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, various epigenetic clocks have been constructed to estimate biological age, most commonly using DNA methylation (DNAm). These include "first-generation" clocks such as DNAmAgeHorvath and "second-generation" clocks such as DNAmPhenoAge and DNAmGrimAge. The divergence of one's predicted DNAm age from chronological age, termed DNAmAge acceleration (AA), has been linked to mortality and various aging-related conditions, albeit with varying findings. In metabolic syndrome (MetS) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), it remains inconclusive which DNAm-based predictor(s) is/are closely related to these two metabolic conditions. Therefore, we examined the cross-sectional associations between seven DNAm-based predictors and prevalent metabolic conditions in participants with methylation data from the KORA study. We also analyzed the longitudinal association with time-to-incident T2D and the relative prognostic value compared to clinical predictors from the Framingham 8-year T2D risk function in predicting incident disease over eight years.

resultsGrimAA and PhenoAA difference demonstrated consistently significant associations in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. GrimAA difference reported a larger effect: with prevalent MetS at F4 (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval = [1.06-1.13], p = 2.04E-08), with prevalent T2D at F4 (odds ratio = 1.09 [1.04-1.13], p = 1.38E-04) and with time-to-incident T2D (hazards ratio = 1.05 [1.01-1.10], p = 0.02) for each year increase in GrimAA difference. Mortality risk score was significantly associated with both prevalent metabolic conditions but not in the longitudinal analysis. The inclusion of DNAm-based predictor in the model with Framingham clinical predictors improved discriminative ability, albeit not significantly. Notably, the DNAm-based predictor, when fitted separately, showed a discriminative ability comparable to that of the model with clinical predictors. Overall, no clear pattern of significant associations was identified in the epigenetic measures from the "first-generation" clocks.

conclusionsGrimAA, PhenoAA difference and mortality risk score, derived from the "second-generation" clocks, demonstrated significant associations with both MetS and T2D. These DNAm-based predictors may be useful biomarkers for risk stratification and disease prognosis in our study sample of European ancestry. Further research is warranted to investigate the generalizability of our findings across different ancestries and to examine the underlying shared biological mechanisms.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2DNA MethylationMetabolic SyndromeAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsDiabetesDNAm ageEpigenetic age accelerationMetabolic syndromeRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40200378
PMCPMC11978091

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.