ArticleClinical obesity2025
The association of motivational factors with weight loss and treatment time in a publicly funded weight management clinic.
Article in Clinical obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Scale: Setting Goals for Outcomes Beyond Weight in Evidence-based Obesity Treatment.Current obesity reports · 2026Review
- The association of motivational factors with weight loss and treatment time in a publicly funded weight management clinic.Clinical obesity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study is to explore differences in weight loss (WL) and treatment time with having health, mobility, and/or aesthetics motivations for attempting WL. Data from 7540 adults with overweight or obesity who participated in a publicly funded weight management programme at the Wharton Medical Clinic were analysed. Patients' WL motivations were categorised into six groups: Health only; Health and Aesthetics; Health and Mobility; Health, Mobility and Aesthetics; No Health; and None. Women with Health, Mobility and Aesthetics or No Health motivations had marginally higher WL goals compared to other groups, with no differences in men. Men with Health and Aesthetics or Health and Mobility motivations showed marginally higher 6-month attendance rates. Men who discontinued after one visit were 40% less likely to have a Health and Aesthetics motivation as opposed to Health only, compared to those who continued. No differences were observed in WL between motivation groups in either sex. No correlation was found between WL goals and WL attained. Only weak correlations between treatment time and WL were observed across most motivation groups. Despite small differences in treatment time and WL goals, motivations for attempting WL were not significantly associated with differences in the WL achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.