ArticleBioanalysis2025
Recent discussions and proposals on challenging the 3-tier immunogenicity testing strategies from the European bioanalysis forum.
Article in Bioanalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunogenicity assessment for vidutolimod: a risk-driven approach for a simplified 1-tiered, singlicate anti-drug antibody testing strategy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Cut Point in Immunogenicity Testing: A Flawed Concept We Can Live Without.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European Bioanalysis Forum, in discussions with cross-industry experts from pharmaceutical, biotech, and contract research organizations, is continuing the challenge of the traditional 3-Tier immunogenicity testing strategy, proposing a simpler, context-driven 1-Tier approach, a recent paradigm shift that emphasizes clinical relevance and the impact of anti-drug antibodies over mere incidence. In a workshop at the 17
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.