Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201059›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025

The role of affective touch in mental illness: a systematic review of CT fiber dysregulation in psychological disorders and the therapeutic potential of CT fiber stimulation.

Martina Papi, Davide Decandia, Daniela Laricchiuta, Debora Cutuli, Livia Buratta, Maurizio Peciccia, Claudia Mazzeschi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martina PapiDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Davide DecandiaLaboratory of Experimental and Behavioral Neurophysiology, Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (IRCCS) Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Daniela LaricchiutaDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Debora CutuliLaboratory of Experimental and Behavioral Neurophysiology, Scientific Institutes for Research, Hospitalization, and Healthcare (IRCCS) Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Livia BurattaDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Maurizio PecicciaDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Claudia MazzeschiDepartment of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Education, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past few decades, research on affective touch has clarified its impact on key psychological functions essential for environmental adaptation, such as self-awareness, self-other differentiation, attachment, and stress response. These effects are primarily driven by the stimulation of C-tactile (CT) fibers. Despite significant advancements in understanding the fundamental mechanisms of affective touch, its clinical applications in mental health remain underdeveloped. This systematic review aims to rigorously assess the scientific literature on the relationship between CT fiber stimulation and psychological disorders, evaluating its potential as a therapeutic intervention. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search was performed in the EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases for articles published in the last 10 years. The review focused on two main aspects: (1) potential dysregulation of CT fibers in individuals with psychological disorders, and (2) psychological treatments based on CT fiber stimulation and their psychological and functional outcomes. Results: Most studies investigating CT fiber dysregulation in psychological disorders reported sensory alterations, with patients rating affective touch as less pleasant than healthy controls. These differences were often associated with dysregulation in the reward network and interoceptive processing, with several studies suggesting reduced insular cortex activation as a contributing factor. Regarding psychological treatments, only a limited number of studies analyzed therapies based on CT fiber stimulation. Despite methodological variations and differences in psychological diagnoses, the available evidence suggests that affective touch therapies can effectively reduce symptom severity and improve interoception across different psychological conditions. Discussion: The findings underscore the potential of affective touch as a therapeutic avenue for psychological disorders. However, given the dearth of studies on this topic, further analyses are necessary to fully understand its mechanisms and clinical efficacy. Expanding research in this area could provide valuable insights into functional impairments related to CT fiber dysregulation and support the development of targeted interventions for mental health treatment.

Indexed as

affective touch therapiesaffiliative touchC tactile afferentpsychological disorderpsychological treatmentsocial touch

Identifiers

PMID40201059
PMCPMC11975928

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.