Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201097›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2025

Considerations on optimizing the patient experience during assisted reproductive technology treatment: a qualitative analysis.

Angela Li, Ariel L Scalise, Emma Mayette, Nicolette McGeorge, Kaitlyn James, Shruthi Mahalingaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela LiDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ariel L ScaliseDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emma MayetteDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nicolette McGeorgeCharles River Analytics, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kaitlyn JamesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shruthi MahalingaiahDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

NCCDPHP CDC HHS R43 DP006690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To study the structural and human factors that negatively and positively influence the patient experience during assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Design: Qualitative study involving 15 patients who had previously undergone ART, interviewed between August and October 2022. Consented participants underwent semistructured interviews. Transcripts were coded through the constant comparative method, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify predominant themes. Subjects: Individuals who underwent ART between January 2017 and April 2022. Exposure: Assisted reproductive technology with transfer of at least one embryo. Main Outcome Measures: Factors positively and negatively influencing the patient experience. Results: Themes identified from factors that negatively influenced care were the high burden and complexity of financing fertility treatment, unsatisfactory provider-patient communication, self-administration of injectable medications, and the complex and unpredictable nature of fertility treatment. Themes in factors that positively influenced care were positive provider rapport and collaborative decision making, social support networks, and alternative health therapies including acupuncture. Conclusion: Patients faced challenges with treatment financing, poor provider communication, and self-administration of injectable medications. However, positive provider relationships, social support, and complementary therapies such as acupuncture were identified as helpful factors.

Indexed as

Assisted reproductive technologyin vitro fertilization (IVF)patient experiencequalitative methods

Identifiers

PMID40201097
PMCPMC11973804

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.