ArticleF&S reports2025
Considerations on optimizing the patient experience during assisted reproductive technology treatment: a qualitative analysis.
Article in F&S reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thematic analysis of a United Kingdom-wide survey to explore women's perceptions and concerns about assisted reproductive technology.Human fertility (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Clinical Delivery of Whole Systems Traditional Chinese Medicine and Impacts Upon Patient Reported Outcomes During IVF.Global advances in integrative medicine and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To study the structural and human factors that negatively and positively influence the patient experience during assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Design: Qualitative study involving 15 patients who had previously undergone ART, interviewed between August and October 2022. Consented participants underwent semistructured interviews. Transcripts were coded through the constant comparative method, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify predominant themes. Subjects: Individuals who underwent ART between January 2017 and April 2022. Exposure: Assisted reproductive technology with transfer of at least one embryo. Main Outcome Measures: Factors positively and negatively influencing the patient experience. Results: Themes identified from factors that negatively influenced care were the high burden and complexity of financing fertility treatment, unsatisfactory provider-patient communication, self-administration of injectable medications, and the complex and unpredictable nature of fertility treatment. Themes in factors that positively influenced care were positive provider rapport and collaborative decision making, social support networks, and alternative health therapies including acupuncture. Conclusion: Patients faced challenges with treatment financing, poor provider communication, and self-administration of injectable medications. However, positive provider relationships, social support, and complementary therapies such as acupuncture were identified as helpful factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.