ArticleClinical hypertension2025
Comparison of inspiratory muscle strength and aerobic exercise training and detraining on blood pressure in hypertensive patients.
Article in Clinical hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the effects of inspiratory muscle strength training and aerobic exercise training on vascular function in patients with hypertension.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Trial
- Effects of aerobic and inspiratory strength muscle training on exaggerated blood pressure response during exercise in hypertensive patients.Clinical hypertension · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) as a time-efficient alternative to widely recommended aerobic exercise (AE) for reducing and maintaining blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Methods: Twenty-eight hypertensive patients (aged 61 ± 7 years) were randomly assigned to IMST ( Results: The mean (standard deviation) change in brachial SBP from baseline to 8 week post-intervention significantly decreased in both the IMST group [-9.1 (12.1) mmHg, Conclusions: Both IMST and AE effectively reduced brachial and central BP after 8-week interventions in hypertensive patients. While IMST presents a time-efficient adjunctive option to AE, its long-term effectiveness remains uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.