SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
A bibliometric analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiomics: trends and insights.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics: Current Applications and Future Directions.MedComm · 2026Review
- Bibliometric and visual analysis of artificial intelligence-related research in osteoarthritis: Trends and frontiers (2008-2025).Medicine · 2026Review
- Integrated primary tumor and all metastatic lymph nodes radiomics from 18 F-FDG PET/CT for precise M1 subclassification in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Deep learning-radiomics-SUVmax integration fromFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant tumor characterized by distinct geographic and pathological features. Enhancing diagnostic accuracy and timeliness in NPC is crucial for clinical implications. Radiomics has demonstrated significant potential in the clinical management of NPC. Nonetheless, a paucity of bibliometric studies has systematically examined the existing literature in th is domain. The objective of this study was to assess the current landscape and project future trends in NPC research. Methods: This study conducted a search on English-language literature concerning the application of radiomics within the field of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) research from January 2015 to July 1, 2024, utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. Bibliometric and visual analyses were performed using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software on publications related to countries/regions, authors, journals, references, and keywords. Results: A total of 311 documents were retrieved, yielding 229 eligible documents after screening, comprising 209 articles and 20 reviews. Annual publications showed an upward trend, while citations revealed a generally declining trend. Notably, China contributed the most publications (n=175). Tian Jie and Dong Di each published 13 papers, and Zhang B was the most frequently co-cited author. Frontiers in Oncology published the most articles (n=25), and the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics had the highest citation count (n=331). Sun Yat-sen University led institutional publications (n=39). The radiomics research in NPC focuses on survival prediction, texture analysis, and distant metastasis, and may guide future research directions. Conclusion: The application of radiomics in NRC is growing annually, as indicated by bibliometric analysis. Radiomics has enhanced the precision of preoperative diagnosis, prediction, and prognosis in NRC. Bibliometric findings offer insights into radiomics research trends. However, creating extensive NPC datasets and bridging the research-to-clinical gap pose significant challenges. Future research should focus on these areas to advance the development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.