Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201390›Full record

ArticleImmunoTargets and therapy2025

Comprehensive Analyses of Single-Cell and Bulk RNA Sequencing Data From M2 Macrophages to Elucidate the Immune Prognostic Signature in Patients with Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis.

Qiao Tang, Liang Tang, Xiaofeng Wang, Yongxin Zhang, Wenwei Liu, Ting Yang, Yuxin Wu, Yuanchen Ma, Tianxiang Lei, Wu Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ImmunoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qiao Tang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0003-3418-8048
Liang Tang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xiaofeng Wang *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yongxin ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wenwei LiuCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Ting YangCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yuxin WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yuanchen MaCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Tianxiang LeiDepartment of Thyroid and Hernia Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wu SongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-SenYou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The peritoneum is a common site of metastasis in gastric cancer (GC), associated with poor prognosis and significant morbidity. The proclivity of GCs to metastasize to the peritoneum has been hypothesized to occur due the latter's immunosuppressive microenvironment, such as stromal infiltration and M2 macrophage enrichment, which are associated with increased risk of PM. As far as we know, a model that can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with GCPM is still lacking. Consequently, we constructed a prognostic risk model based on M2 macrophages associated with gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis, aiming to enhance predictive precision and guide tailored therapeutic interventions. Methods: M2 macrophage-associated genes were identified in combination with marker genes from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and modular genes from weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA). A prognostic model was constructed via LASSO analysis and validated in internal and external cohorts. We further compared the immune microenvironment, immune checkpoints, and chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity between patient groups stratified by risk to clarify the immune landscape in the GCPM. Results: Our study identified 38 M2 macrophage-related genes via single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing. We developed a prognostic model based on the expression levels of 4 signature genes: DAB2, SPARC, PLTP, and FOLR2. The feasibility of the model was validated with internal and external validation sets (TCGA, GSE62254 and IMvigor210). The model also supported the prediction results of prognosis on the basis of the immunohistochemical results. Notably, patients with higher risk scores had a lower proportion of MSI-H and TMB, a higher prevalence of stages III-IV, and a lower likelihood of responding favorably to immunotherapy. Conclusion: Our prognostic risk model could effectively predict the prognosis and response to chemo-immune therapy in patients with GCPM. The risk score is a promising independent prognostic factor that is closely correlated with the immune microenvironment and clinicopathological characteristics.

Indexed as

gastric cancerimmunotherapy responseM2 macrophagesperitoneal metastasisprognosisscRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID40201390
PMCPMC11977558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.