ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Genetic analysis reveals the shared genetic architecture between breast cancer and atrial fibrillation.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epidemiological studies have observed an association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and breast cancer (BC). However, the underlying mechanisms linking these two conditions remain unclear. This study aims to systematically explore the genetic association between AF and BC. Methods: We utilized the largest available genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for European individuals, including summary data for AF (N = 1,030,836) and BC (N = 247,173). Multiple approaches were employed to systematically investigate the genetic relationship between AF and BC from the perspectives of pleiotropy and causality. Results: Global genetic analysis using LDSC and HDL revealed a genetic correlation between AF and BC (rg = 0.0435, P = 0.039). Mixer predicted genetic overlap between non-MHC regions of the two conditions (n = 125, rg = 0.05). Local genetic analyses using LAVA and GWAS-PW identified 22 regions with potential genetic sharing. Cross-trait meta-analysis by CPASSOC identified one novel pleiotropic SNP and 14 pleiotropic SNPs, which were subsequently annotated. Eight of these SNPs passed Bayesian colocalization tests, including one novel pleiotropic SNP. Further fine-mapping analysis identified a set of causal SNPs for each significant SNP. TWAS analyses using JTI and FOCUS models jointly identified 10 pleiotropic genes. Phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) of novel pleiotropic SNPs identified two eQTLs (PELO, ITGA1). Gene-based PheWAS results showed strong associations with BMI, height, and educational attainment. PCGA methods combining GTEx V8 tissue data and single-cell RNA data identified 16 co-enriched tissue types (including cardiovascular, reproductive, and digestive systems) and 5 cell types (including macrophages and smooth muscle cells). Finally, univariable and multivariable bidirectional Mendelian randomization analyses excluded a causal relationship between AF and BC. Conclusion: This study systematically investigated the shared genetic overlap between AF and BC. Several pleiotropic SNPs and genes were identified, and co-enriched tissue and cell types were revealed. The findings highlight common mechanisms from a genetic perspective rather than a causal relationship. This study provides new insights into the AF-BC association and suggests potential experimental targets and directions for future research. Additionally, the results underscore the importance of monitoring the potential risk of one disease in patients diagnosed with the other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.