ArticleHemaSphere2025
NGS-MRD negativity in post-HSCT ALL spares unnecessary therapeutic interventions triggered by borderline qPCR results without an increase in relapse risk.
Article in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis Between the EuroClonality-NGS Approach and the LymphoTrackInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genomic fusion breakpoints for DNA-based measurable residual disease monitoring in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Technological Advances, Clinical Translations and Current Challenges.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Adapting measurable residual disease evaluation to clinical practice for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- An Update on Flow Cytometry Analysis of Hematological Malignancies: Focus on Standardization.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is vital for timely therapeutic intervention planning. However, interpreting low-positive results from the current standard method, quantitative PCR (qPCR) of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements (IG/TR), poses challenges due to the risk of false positivity caused by non-specific amplification. We aimed to improve MRD detection specificity using the next-generation amplicon sequencing (NGS) of IG/TR rearrangements for better relapse prediction. In pediatric and young adult ALL patients undergoing sequential post-HSCT MRD monitoring, we prospectively re-tested positive non-quantifiable qPCR results with NGS-MRD using the EuroClonality-NGS approach. We were able to confirm 13 out of 47 (27.7%) qPCR positive results using the more specific NGS-MRD method. Out of 10 patients with at least one MRD positivity confirmed by NGS, six relapsed (60%) 1-3.7 months after testing. Among 25 patients with all NGS-MRD results negative, two relapses occurred (8%) after 5.1 and 12.1 months. One-year RFS was 40% versus 96% and 3-year OS was 33.3% versus 94.4% for the NGS-positive and NGS-negative groups, respectively. The difference was not attributable to a varying rate of therapeutic interventions. Six patients out of 14 who had immunosuppressive treatment tapered or received donor lymphocyte infusion in response to MRD positivity developed significant graft versus host disease, leading to one fatality. This underscores the importance of enhancing the post-HSCT relapse risk prediction accuracy through NGS-MRD testing to avoid unnecessary interventions.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.