Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40201744›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2025

NGS-MRD negativity in post-HSCT ALL spares unnecessary therapeutic interventions triggered by borderline qPCR results without an increase in relapse risk.

Krystof Seferna, Michael Svaton, Andrea Rennerova, Aneta Skotnicova, Leona Reznickova, Tatana Valova, Petr Sedlacek, Petr Riha, Renata Formankova, Petra Keslova and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Krystof SefernaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6541-099X
Michael SvatonCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2966-3687
Andrea RennerovaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Aneta SkotnicovaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Leona ReznickovaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Tatana ValovaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Petr SedlacekDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Petr RihaDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Renata FormankovaDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Petra KeslovaDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Lucie SramkovaDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Jan StaryDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Jan ZunaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Alexandra KolenovaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology National Institute of Children's Diseases and Comenius University Bratislava Slovakia.
Cyril SalekInstitute of Haematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-0021-3247
Jan TrkaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.
Eva FronkovaCLIP-Childhood Leukaemia Investigation Prague, Department of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol Prague Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is vital for timely therapeutic intervention planning. However, interpreting low-positive results from the current standard method, quantitative PCR (qPCR) of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements (IG/TR), poses challenges due to the risk of false positivity caused by non-specific amplification. We aimed to improve MRD detection specificity using the next-generation amplicon sequencing (NGS) of IG/TR rearrangements for better relapse prediction. In pediatric and young adult ALL patients undergoing sequential post-HSCT MRD monitoring, we prospectively re-tested positive non-quantifiable qPCR results with NGS-MRD using the EuroClonality-NGS approach. We were able to confirm 13 out of 47 (27.7%) qPCR positive results using the more specific NGS-MRD method. Out of 10 patients with at least one MRD positivity confirmed by NGS, six relapsed (60%) 1-3.7 months after testing. Among 25 patients with all NGS-MRD results negative, two relapses occurred (8%) after 5.1 and 12.1 months. One-year RFS was 40% versus 96% and 3-year OS was 33.3% versus 94.4% for the NGS-positive and NGS-negative groups, respectively. The difference was not attributable to a varying rate of therapeutic interventions. Six patients out of 14 who had immunosuppressive treatment tapered or received donor lymphocyte infusion in response to MRD positivity developed significant graft versus host disease, leading to one fatality. This underscores the importance of enhancing the post-HSCT relapse risk prediction accuracy through NGS-MRD testing to avoid unnecessary interventions.

Identifiers

PMID40201744
PMCPMC11978274

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.