ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
An interpreting machine learning models to predict amputation risk in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a multi-center study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- [Comparison of the predictive efficacy of the Wagner, SINBAD, and WIfI grading systems for short-term wound non-healing and amputation in patients with DFUs].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026Article
- Inflammation and nutrition-derived indicators for predicting amputation risk in patients with type 2 diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting Wound Infection in Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Machine Learning Model Performance in Diabetic Foot Ulcer: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- The application of artificial intelligence models in predicting the risk of diabetic foot: a multicenter study.BioData mining · 2025Article
- Predicting major amputation risk in diabetic foot ulcers using comparative machine learning models for enhanced clinical decision-making.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Federated multimodal AI for precision-equitable diabetes care.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) constitute a significant complication among individuals with diabetes and serve as a primary cause of nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation (LEA) within this population. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict the risk of LEA in DFU patients and used SHapley additive explanations (SHAPs) to interpret the model. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 1,035 patients with DFUs at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital were utilized as the training cohort to develop the ML models. Data from 297 patients across multiple tertiary centers were used for external validation. We then used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis to identify predictors of amputation. We developed five ML models [logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] to predict LEA in DFU patients. The performance of these models was evaluated using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), precision, recall, accuracy, and F1 score. Finally, the SHAP method was used to ascertain the significance of the features and to interpret the model. Results: In the final cohort comprising 1332 individuals, 600 patients underwent amputation. Following hyperparameter optimization, the XGBoost model achieved the best amputation prediction performance with an accuracy of 0.94, a precision of 0.96, an F1 score of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.93 for the internal validation set on the basis of the 17 features. For the external validation set, the model attained an accuracy of 0.78, a precision of 0.93, an F1 score of 0.78, and an AUC of 0.83. Through SHAP analysis, we identified white blood cell counts, lymphocyte counts, and blood urea nitrogen levels as the model's main predictors. Conclusion: The XGBoost algorithm-based prediction model can be used to dynamically estimate the risk of LEA in DFU patients, making it a valuable tool for preventing the progression of DFUs to amputation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.