Evidence mapPaperPMID 40201760Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

An interpreting machine learning models to predict amputation risk in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a multi-center study.

Haoran Tao, Lili You, Yuhan Huang, Yunxiang Chen, Li Yan, Dan Liu, Shan Xiao, Bichai Yuan, Meng Ren

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haoran Tao *Department of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lili You *Department of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhan Huang *Department of Endocrinology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, China.
Yunxiang ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, Dongguan People's Hospital Puji Branch, Dongguan, China.
Li YanDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shan XiaoDepartment of Endocrinology, People's Hospital of Shenzhen Baoan District, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Bichai YuanDepartment of Endocrinology, Jieyang People's Hospital, Jieyang, China.
Meng RenDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) constitute a significant complication among individuals with diabetes and serve as a primary cause of nontraumatic lower-extremity amputation (LEA) within this population. We aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models to predict the risk of LEA in DFU patients and used SHapley additive explanations (SHAPs) to interpret the model. Methods: In this retrospective study, data from 1,035 patients with DFUs at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital were utilized as the training cohort to develop the ML models. Data from 297 patients across multiple tertiary centers were used for external validation. We then used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis to identify predictors of amputation. We developed five ML models [logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] to predict LEA in DFU patients. The performance of these models was evaluated using several metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), precision, recall, accuracy, and F1 score. Finally, the SHAP method was used to ascertain the significance of the features and to interpret the model. Results: In the final cohort comprising 1332 individuals, 600 patients underwent amputation. Following hyperparameter optimization, the XGBoost model achieved the best amputation prediction performance with an accuracy of 0.94, a precision of 0.96, an F1 score of 0.94 and an AUC of 0.93 for the internal validation set on the basis of the 17 features. For the external validation set, the model attained an accuracy of 0.78, a precision of 0.93, an F1 score of 0.78, and an AUC of 0.83. Through SHAP analysis, we identified white blood cell counts, lymphocyte counts, and blood urea nitrogen levels as the model's main predictors. Conclusion: The XGBoost algorithm-based prediction model can be used to dynamically estimate the risk of LEA in DFU patients, making it a valuable tool for preventing the progression of DFUs to amputation.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalDiabetic FootMachine LearningAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC Curvediabetic foot ulcerlower extremity amputationmachine learningrisk factorSHAP

Identifiers

PMID40201760
PMCPMC11975565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.