ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Analysis of Prognostic Factors for Drilling Drainage Surgery in Patients with Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Development of a Predictive Nomogram.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the influencing factors affecting prognosis in patients undergoing drilling drainage surgery for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) and to construct a nomogram predictive model. Methods: Clinical data of 247 patients with HICH admitted to our hospital between October 2020 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a modeling cohort (173 cases) and a validation cohort (74 cases). The modeling group was separated into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group based on postoperative prognosis. Results: Among the 173 patients in the modeling cohort, 19 patients (10.98%) experienced poor prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, preoperative GCS score, diabetes history, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulmonary infection and postoperative hematoma volume were the risk factors for the prognosis of drilling drainage surgery for patients with HICH (P<0.05). The AUC of the modeling group and validation group was 0.962 and 0.946, and the H-L test showed Conclusion: Age, preoperative GCS score, history of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulmonary infection and postoperative hematoma volume are key prognostic factors affecting outcomes after drilling drainage surgery in HICH patients. The established nomogram model based on these variables accurately predicts the risk of poor postoperative prognosis and can serve as an effective clinical reference tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.