ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Role of Augmentation in the Fixation of Osteoporotic Fractures.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Piezoelectricity Regulating Immune Osteogenesis in Osteoporosis.BME frontiers · 2025Article
- Simultaneous minimally invasive surgery improves outcomes and reduces complications in elderly with combined osteoporotic fractures.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporotic fractures present a significant challenge due to the compromised bone quality, leading to complications in traditional fracture fixation methods. Augmentation techniques have emerged as a valuable approach to enhance the stability of fracture fixation in osteoporotic patients. Aim: This review explores the various augmentation methods used in fracture management, including polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and calcium phosphate cements, as well as novel injectable materials. Additionally, the role of biomechanical augmentation techniques, such as locked plating and hybrid fixation, is discussed in enhancing fixation strength. Clinical applications in vertebral, proximal femur, and upper extremity fractures are examined, with a focus on the effectiveness of augmentation in improving patient outcomes. Despite the benefits, augmentation presents challenges, such as the risks associated with cement leakage and the economic burden on healthcare systems. The review also highlights future directions, including the development of bioactive and biodegradable materials, as well as innovations in minimally invasive techniques. Conclusion: Overall, augmentation plays a crucial role in addressing the limitations of traditional fixation in osteoporotic bone, offering promising solutions to improve fracture management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.