ArticleCancer medicine2025
Bioinformatics Combined With Biological Experiments to Identify the Pathogenetic Link of Type 2 Diabetes for Breast Cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between gestational diabetes mellitus and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) constitutes a significant risk factor for breast cancer (BC), with affected women exhibiting a two- to three-fold increased likelihood of developing BC. Furthermore, women diagnosed with both BC and T2DM tend to experience poorer prognoses and exhibit greater resistance to various treatments compared to their non-diabetic counterparts. Consequently, elucidating the comorbidities associated with T2DM and BC is instrumental in enhancing the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for BC.
methodsA series of bioinformatics methods including weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis, machine learning, and single-cell sequencing analysis were used to identify the pathogenetic molecules of T2DM for BC. Biological experiments including CCK-8, colony formation, wound healing, transwell assay, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence were performed to determine the molecule effect.
resultsBy conducting WGCNA and DEG analysis on the profiles of T2DM (GSE25724 and GSE20966) and the TCGA cohort of BC, we identified a total of 27 common hub genes shared between T2DM and BC. These genes were significantly enriched in pathways related to cell differentiation, cellular developmental processes, focal adhesion, and the MAPK signaling pathway. Notably, among these 27 genes, CCNB2, XRCC2, and CENPI were associated with poor prognosis in BC. Moreover, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed that CCNB2, XRCC2, and CENPI are enriched in cancer cells within BC tissues. Additionally, we observed that CCNB2, XRCC2, and CENPI were elevated in BC tissues provided by patients with a diabetes history and associated with KI67 expression. Hyperglycemia treatment elevated the expression levels of CCNB2, XRCC2, and CENPI in BC cells, which correlated with increased cell proliferation and mobility. Conversely, the knockdown of these genes partially mitigated the pro-proliferative and pro-migratory effects induced by hyperglycemia in BC cells.
conclusionOur findings suggested that CCNB2, XRCC2, and CENPI may serve as key pathogenic mediators linking T2DM and BC. Targeting these molecules could potentially attenuate the adverse impacts of T2DM on BC progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.