Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40202606›Full record

ReviewMolecular biomedicine2025

Applications of gene pair methods in clinical research: advancing precision medicine.

Changchun Wu, Xueqin Xie, Xin Yang, Mengze Du, Hao Lin, Jian Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Changchun WuThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.
Xueqin XieThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.
Xin YangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China.
Mengze DuSchool of Healthcare Technology, Chengdu Neusoft University, Chengdu, 611844, China.
Hao LinThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China. hlin@uestc.edu.cn.
Jian HuangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China. hj@uestc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-8892

Funding

Incubation Program for Innovative Science and Technology in UESTC Y03023206100209Medico-Engineering Cooperation Funds from University of Electronic Science and Technology of China ZYGX2022YGRH004National Natural Science Foundation of China 62371112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of high-throughput sequencing technologies has revolutionized biomedical research, producing vast amounts of gene expression data that hold immense potential for biological discovery and clinical applications. Effectively mining these large-scale, high-dimensional data is crucial for facilitating disease detection, subtype differentiation, and understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying disease progression. However, the conventional paradigm of single-gene profiling, measuring absolute expression levels of individual genes, faces critical limitations in clinical implementation. These include vulnerability to batch effects and platform-dependent normalization requirements. In contrast, emerging approaches analyzing relative expression relationships between gene pairs demonstrate unique advantages. By focusing on binary comparisons of two genes' expression magnitudes, these methods inherently normalize experimental variations while capturing biologically stable interaction patterns. In this review, we systematically evaluate gene pair-based analytical frameworks. We classify eleven computational approaches into two fundamental categories: expression value-based methods quantifying differential expression patterns, and rank-based methods exploiting transcriptional ordering relationships. To bridge methodological development with practical implementation, we establish a reproducible analytical pipeline incorporating feature selection, classifier construction, and model evaluation modules using real-world benchmark datasets from pulmonary tuberculosis studies. These findings position gene pair analysis as a transformative paradigm for mining high-dimensional omics data, with direct implications for precision biomarker discovery and mechanistic studies of disease progression.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchComputational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingPrecision MedicineHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansBatch effectsClinical researchGene pairHigh-throughput sequencingRanking relationships

Identifiers

PMID40202606
PMCPMC11982013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.