Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40203278›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Probabilistic classification of gene-by-treatment interactions on molecular count phenotypes.

Yuriko Harigaya, Nana Matoba, Brandon D Le, Jordan M Valone, Jason L Stein, Michael I Love, William Valdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuriko HarigayaDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1879-5214
Nana MatobaDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-0134
Brandon D LeDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jordan M ValoneDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jason L SteinDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Michael I LoveDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8401-0545
William ValdarDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-0430

Funding

Statistical Modeling of Multiparental and Genetic Reference PopulationsR35GM127000 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI William Valdar · 2018 to 2026
$3.1M
The influence of common genetic variation on brain overgrowth pathwaysR01MH120125 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
pathQTL: Integrative Multi-Omics Causal Inference of Molecular Mechanisms Leading to Neuropsychiatric IllnessR01MH118349 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LOVE, MICHAEL ISAIAH, STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Quantifying the developmental trajectory of autism-associated brain overgrowth using 3D cellular resolution imagingR01MH121433 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI STEIN, JASON LOUIS · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
Predoctoral Training Program in Bioinformatics and Computational BiologyT32GM135123 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michael Isaiah Love, William Valdar · 2021 to 2026
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127000NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135123NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118349NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120125NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation can modulate response to treatment (G×T) or environmental stimuli (G×E), both of which can be highly consequential in biomedicine. An effective approach to identifying G×T signals and gaining insight into molecular mechanisms is mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) of molecular count phenotypes, such as gene expression and chromatin accessibility, under multiple treatment conditions, which is termed response molecular QTL mapping. Although standard approaches evaluate the interaction between genetics and treatment conditions, they do not distinguish between meaningful interpretations such as whether a genetic effect is observed only in the treated condition or whether a genetic effect is observed always but accentuated in the treated condition. To address this gap, we have developed a downstream method for classifying response molecular QTLs into subclasses with meaningful genetic interpretations. Our method uses Bayesian model selection and assigns posterior probabilities to different types of G×T interactions for a given feature-SNP pair. We compare linear and nonlinear regression of log ⁡ -scale counts, noting that the latter accounts for an expected biological relationship between the genotype and the molecular count phenotype. Through simulation and application to existing datasets of molecular response QTLs, we show that our method provides an intuitive and well-powered framework to report and interpret G×T interactions. We provide a software package, ClassifyGxT [1].

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionQuantitative Trait LociBayes TheoremChromosome MappingGenotypeHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID40203278
PMCPMC12021428

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.