SynthesisNursing research
Systematic Review of Effects of Medication Dispenser Use by Home-Dwelling Older Adults.
Synthesis in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of using medication reminder technologies by home-dwelling older citizens: a systematic review.Age and ageing · 2026Pooled it
- Can Technology Use Alleviate Workforce Needs in Finnish Assisted Living Services? A Convergent Mixed-Methods Study of Automatic Medicine Dispensers and Night-Time Monitoring.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulation aging has increased the need for solutions that help older adults live independently in their own homes, where medication management is a major challenge.
objectivesIn this systematic review, we assessed the effects of medication dispensers among home-dwelling older adults on outcomes within the five domains of the Quintuple Aim framework: user experiences, health and well-being outcomes, health service utilization and costs, care professional experiences, and equity.
methodsWe identified relevant studies by searching databases (Scopus, CENTRAL, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Reviews) from January 2017 to April 2022 with a predefined search strategy and two-person abstract and full-text screening. Two authors extracted the most relevant data and assessed quality for each included study. We assessed the evidence using a four-level quality rating measure: strong, moderate, limited, or no evidence.
resultsWe included five original studies and three systematic reviews, which provided information on 20 additional original studies. Data were extracted from these 25 original studies. We found significant results in 16 of them, mostly pointing to the beneficial effects of dispenser devices. Significant results for health and well-being outcomes were found in 13 out of 21 studies in which these were assessed, for service utilization in two out of five studies, for costs in two out of three studies, and for patient/carer experiences in one out of five studies. No study evaluated professional experiences or equity outcomes. Overall, strong evidence of a beneficial effect of dispenser devices in any outcome is lacking, but they can improve health outcomes (moderate evidence of beneficial effects of using dispenser devices on systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and hemoglobin A1c levels). For other outcome domains, there is no or only limited evidence for beneficial effects of dispenser devices. DISCUSSION: We found that the use of dispenser devices by home-dwelling older adults can improve clinical health outcomes and may reduce health service utilization and costs. More high-quality research is needed to get a better insight into their effects on service utilization and costs. Future studies should also examine the effects on care professionals' experiences and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.