ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025
Lifestyle and cognition: Separating the effects of average lifestyle and lifestyle changes based on the LIBRA score.
Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A brief checklist of modifiable dementia risk factors (RF12): associations with cognitive and affective measures in an Italian cohort.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- The integral role of lifestyle in the prevention and management of hypertension and associated cardiometabolic and cognitive disorders: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe LIfestyle for BRAin Health (LIBRA) score, consisting of twelve factors, highlights individuals' potential for dementia risk reduction through lifestyle. The LIBRA score includes modifiable protective factors such as low to moderate alcohol consumption, and risk factors such as hypertension.
objectiveWe studied whether LIBRA scores are longitudinally associated with cognition, and to what extent this is due to between-person differences or within-person changes in LIBRA scores.
methodsIndividuals were included from four Dutch community-based cohorts: Doetinchem Cohort Study (DCS; n = 4770), Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS; n = 1295), Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA; n = 2391) and the Rotterdam Study (RS; n = 5205). The number of available LIBRA components (range 7-11) and timepoints (range 3-9) differed per cohort. Outcomes were standardized processing speed (LDST), memory (15-word delayed recall of the verbal learning test (VLT)) and verbal fluency. Hybrid mixed models were fit for the association of 1) mean LIBRA score and 2) change in LIBRA between subsequent timepoints. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education and learning effects. Interactions of the mean LIBRA score with age, and change in LIBRA score with age were tested in two separate models.
resultsHigher (i.e., unhealthier) mean LIBRA scores were associated with worse cognitive speed (lower LDST z-score per 1-point higher LIBRA, range between cohorts: 0.039 - 0.0587), memory (VLT, 0.026 - 0.035), and fluency (0.020 - 0.033). Associations of mean LIBRA scores with cognitive function were stronger with older age (LDST: significant age-interaction, 2 out of 4 cohorts; VLT and fluency: 1 out of 4 cohorts). Relative to 65-year-old individuals with a mean LIBRA score at the 50th percentile, individuals at the 90th percentile of the LIBRA score showed an estimated 1.9-3.2 years more advanced cognitive ageing for LDST, 1.9 - 5.3 years for VLT and 1.4 - 1.7 years for fluency. Within-person change in LIBRA showed no consistent associations with cognitive decline.
conclusionsAn individual's mean LIBRA score, but not their change in LIBRA score over time, was longitudinally associated with cognitive functioning. In the general population, the investigated version of the LIBRA score is possibly not suitable to capture how cognition (as a proxy for dementia risk) changes with improvements in lifestyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.