ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025
Association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA study investigating the association between premarital pregnancy and the adverse birth outcomes has not been conducted in Japan. This study aimed to investigate an association of premarital pregnancy with adverse birth outcomes and its characteristics in Japan, using national birth data.
methodsBirth data from the Vital Statistics: Occupational and Industrial Aspects for the fiscal years 2010, 2015, and 2020 were used. Firstborn and singleton births were used, and we restricted the data to infants born to Japanese parents. We defined the status of premarital pregnancy based on the length of marriage at the time of birth. Rates of preterm birth, term low birth weight (TLBW), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) were used as outcomes. Log-binomial regression analysis was conducted to calculate the adjusted risk ratio of premarital pregnancy for each of the outcomes. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with premarital pregnancy.
resultsData from 888,459 births were included in the analysis. The results of log-binomial regression showed that the risk of premarital pregnancy was statistically significantly higher than that of postmarital pregnancy for all the outcomes, and the risk ratios were 1.65 (95% confidence intervals (CI):1.58, 1.72), 1.17 (95% CI:1.12, 1.22), and 1.12 (95% CI:1.08, 1.17) for preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA, respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that lower non-manual workers, manual workers, and others were significantly and positively associated with premarital pregnancy compared to upper non-manual workers in terms of maternal and paternal occupations.
conclusionsIt was shown that premarital pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth, TLBW, and SGA and was positively associated with parental occupations such as lower non-manual workers and manual workers in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.