SynthesisJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis on a global scale.
Synthesis in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Complications in Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Diseases: Pathophysiology, Clinical Implications, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Rising Burden and Clinical Impact of Metabolic Syndrome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Real-World Cohort Study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Article
- A JAK of two trades: beneficial or adverse effects of Janus kinase inhibition for plasma LDL-cholesterol and major adverse cardiovascular events in inflammatory bowel disease patients?Current opinion in lipidology · 2026Review
- Influence of metabolic syndrome on disease characteristics and activity in inflammatory bowel disease: A retrospective cohort study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Global prevalence of metabolic syndrome among individuals with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 72,129 patients.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: The Emerging Role of Metabolic Dysfunction.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Exocytosed ATP as a therapeutic target for inflammatory and metabolic diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Enteropathic arthritis is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolism.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Autoimmune Markers in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study From Türkiye.International journal of endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities that increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may be at higher risk of developing MetS due to chronic inflammation, altered adipokine profiles, and the effects of corticosteroid treatment. However, the prevalence of MetS in IBD patients remains inconsistent across studies. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the prevalence of MetS in IBD patients and compare its occurrence between Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
methodsA systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception up to January 19, 2025. Eligible observational studies reporting MetS prevalence in IBD patients were included. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, with heterogeneity assessed via the I² statistic. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software, version 4.0 was used for analysis.
resultsThe pooled prevalence of MetS in IBD patients was 21.8% (95% CI: 14.3-31.6%). The prevalence was higher in UC patients (32.7%, 95% CI: 16.0-55.5%) compared to CD patients (14.1%, 95% CI: 8.6-22.3%). Patients with UC had significantly higher odds of MetS than those with CD (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.03-1.85, P = 0.02). Additionally, IBD patients with MetS were significantly older than those without (MD: 9.89, 95% CI: 5.12-14.67, P < 0.01).
conclusionIn summary, this meta-analysis reveals a notable prevalence of MetS among patients with IBD, particularly in those with UC, where the prevalence is higher than in CD. The analysis also shows that IBD patients with MetS tend to be older, suggesting age as a contributing factor. These findings underscore the need for routine metabolic screening in IBD care, especially in UC and elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.