ArticleJournal of food science2025
Effect of dietary carnosine during in vitro digestion of a burger meal combo model including ascorbic acid as an antioxidant and fructose as a pro-oxidant.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of pork carnosine level on lipid and protein oxidation markers during in vitro co-digestion in a Mediterranean meal model.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2026Article
- Effect of dietary carnosine during in vitro digestion of a burger meal combo model including ascorbic acid as an antioxidant and fructose as a pro-oxidant.Journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carnosine, as a meat constituent, was previously shown to exhibit some pro-oxidative effects during in vitro digestion of a burger meal model in the presence of high (supplemental) level of ascorbic acid (AA). In the current study, effects of dietary carnosine were assessed during in vitro digestion of a burger meal combo model, including intrinsic (low, LCar) and enriched (intermediate, MCar; high, HCar) carnosine in ground pork, with or without dietary levels of AA and/or fructose in simulated beverages. Increased levels of dietary carnosine (MCar and HCar) showed antioxidant activity, irrespective of the digestion phase and the presence of fructose and/or AA. At a dietary level, AA generally acted as an antioxidant, but promoted the formation of glyoxal (GO) in gastric digests and malondialdehyde (MDA) and hexanal in duodenal digests. Fructose generally showed a pro-oxidant effect, but decreased MDA and GO concentrations in both digestion phases. Despite a higher bio-accessible carnosine level measured in HCar, which potentially represents additional health benefits post absorption, MCar treatment provided optimal antioxidant activity during digestion without further effects obtained at the HCar level, showing a ceiling-like effect of dietary carnosine benefits in the digestive environment in vitro. These results demonstrate potential health advantages of increased carnosine in meat during digestion of a meal despite the presence of other redox-active dietary compounds and suggest a potential hormetic effect of carnosine can occur during digestion. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Carnosine, a multifunctional compound naturally present in meat, can bring considerable advantages to meat consumers. Increased dietary levels of carnosine in meat reduced oxidation and the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) during the digestion of a burger meal in the presence of dietary levels of either ascorbic acid (AA) (as an antioxidant) or fructose (as a pro-oxidant). In the context of this study, optimal benefits of carnosine were attained at the intermediate enhancement level, which can be naturally obtained through breeding and nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.