ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Reform progress and achievements of China's incentive policies for pediatric medicine over the last decade.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characteristics, accessibility and regional equity evaluation of pediatric medicines through National Drug Price Negotiation of China, 2017-2024.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impact of China's Drug Review and Approval System Reform on Pediatric Drugs: an Analysis Based on Registration Data from 2015 to 2024.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accessibility of pediatric medicine is a global challenge. The issuance of the "Several Opinions on Ensuring the Use of Children's Medicine" by six ministries in China in 2014 marked the formation of the policy framework. This study aims to systematically review the progress and achievements of incentive policies for China's pediatric medicine. Methods: By analyzing policy documents, clinical trial data, review and approval results, medical insurance directories, volume-based procurement data, as well as adverse reaction reports, the implementation effects of incentive policies for China's pediatric medicine were assessed. Results: China has made progress in legislation, research and development, review and approval, production, access, payment, and use of pediatric medicine. The number and variety of pediatric clinical trials have increased year by year. Some medicine on the Encouraged Research and Submission List of Pediatric Medicine have successfully entered the market. Priority review and approval policies have effectively facilitated the rapid approval of pediatric medicine. However, the availability still needs to be improved, especially in the field of medicine for young children (<6 years). Conclusion: Although incentive policies for China's pediatric medicine have achieved favorable effects, the synergy of the policies still needs to be strengthened. It is recommended that the Chinese government place greater emphasis on the introduction of mandatory regulations and incentive policies, enhance the synergy between policies, use a combination of fiscal and medical insurance tools and follow up on the application of new technologies to comprehensively improve the accessibility of pediatric medicine in the future. This might be helpful for guaranteeing the safety, efficacy and economy of pediatric medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.