ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
How are Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Used in Digital Behavior Change Interventions? A Scoping Review.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using AI to Design and Develop Online Educational Modules to Enhance Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among High-Risk Individuals.Cancers · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review on Artificial Intelligence-Supported Interventions for Nonpharmacologic Management of Chronic Rheumatic Diseases.Arthritis care & research · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Cardiovascular Prevention: A Narrative Review and Governance Framework.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sleep-inducing algorithms: can artificial intelligence help shiftworkers and those working nonstandard hours sleep better?Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Genie in the bottle? a qualitative study of general practitioners' perspectives and information needs concerning digital mental health applications in Germany.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Personalizing a mental health texting intervention using reinforcement learning.Npj mental health research · 2025Article
- Nudges in A Learning Health System: Applications to Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Care.JACC. Advances · 2025Review
- Precision nutrition for cardiometabolic diseases.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring mHealth interventions for medication management: a scoping review of digital tools, implementation barriers, and patient outcomes.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess the current real-world applications of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) as functionality of digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) that influence patient or consumer health behaviors. A scoping review was done across the EMBASE, PsycInfo, PsycNet, PubMed, and Web of Science databases using search terms related to ML/AI, behavioral science, and digital health to find live DBCIs using ML or AI to influence real-world health behaviors in patients or consumers. A total of 32 articles met inclusion criteria. Evidence regarding behavioral domains, target real-world behaviors, and type and purpose of ML and AI used were extracted. The types and quality of research evaluations done on the DBCIs and limitations of the research were also reviewed. Research occurred between October 9, 2023, and January 20, 2024. Twenty-three DBCIs used AI to influence real-world health behaviors. Most common domains were cardiometabolic health (n=5, 21.7%) and lifestyle interventions (n=4, 17.4%). The most common types of ML and AI used were classical ML algorithms (n=10, 43.5%), reinforcement learning (n=8, 34.8%), natural language understanding (n=8, 34.8%), and conversational AI (n=5, 21.7%). Evidence was generally positive, but had limitations such as inability to detect causation, low generalizability, or insufficient study duration to understand long-term outcomes. Despite evidence gaps related to the novelty of the technology, research supports the promise of using AI in DBCIs to manage complex input data and offer personalized, contextualized support for people changing real-world behaviors. Key opportunities are standardizing terminology and improving understanding of what ML and AI are.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.