Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206291›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025

Complement updates in optic neuritis.

Yuhong He, Kai Guo, Jifu Xin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuhong HeDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Kai GuoDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Jifu XinDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory condition of the optic nerve associated with demyelinating diseases like multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. The complement system is crucial in ON pathogenesis, driving blood-optic nerve barrier disruption, inflammation, and tissue damage. This review explores the complement activation pathways-classical, alternative, and lectin-and their roles in ON progression. Key proteins such as C3, C5, and terminal pathway components are highlighted as central to disease mechanisms. Recent advances in complement-targeted therapies, including C1q blockers, C3 and C5 inhibitors, show promising results in clinical and preclinical studies. Novel therapies, like anaphylatoxin receptor blockers and recombinant factor H, expand the treatment landscape, while plasma exchange remains vital for severe, corticosteroid-resistant cases. Challenges remain, such as ON heterogeneity, the long-term safety of complement inhibition, and the need for personalized approaches. Future studies should focus on unraveling complement-mediated mechanisms, identifying biomarkers, and refining therapeutic strategies. This review highlights the critical role of complement in ON and the latest therapeutic advances to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

biomarkercomplementneuromyelitis optica spectrum disordersoptic neuritistreatment

Identifiers

PMID40206291
PMCPMC11978624

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.