ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Unsupervised detection of high-frequency oscillations in intracranial electroencephalogram: promoting a valuable automated diagnostic tool for epilepsy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery a scoping review.Research square · 2026Article
- Deep learning enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop an unsupervised automated method for detecting high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) in intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) signals, addressing the limitations of manual detection processes. Method: The proposed method utilizes an unsupervised convolutional variational autoencoder (CVAE) model in conjunction with the short-term energy method (STE) to analyze two-dimensional time-frequency representations of iEEG signals. Candidate HFOs are identified using STE and transformed into time-frequency maps using the continuous wavelet transform (CWT). The CVAE model is trained for dimensionality reduction and feature reconstruction, followed by clustering of the reconstructed maps using the K-means algorithm for automated HFOs detection. Results: Evaluation of the proposed unsupervised method on clinical iEEG data demonstrates its superior performance compared to traditional supervised models. The automated approach achieves an accuracy of 93.02%, sensitivity of 94.48%, and specificity of 92.06%, highlighting its efficacy in detecting HFOs with high accuracy. Conclusion: The unsupervised automated method developed in this study offers a reliable and efficient solution for detecting HFOs in iEEG signals, overcoming the limitations of manual detection processes of traditional supervised models. By providing clinicians with a clinically useful diagnostic tool, this approach holds promise for enhancing surgical resection planning in epilepsy patients and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.