Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206429›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2023

Binned multinomial logistic regression for integrative cell-type annotation.

Keshav Motwani, Rhonda Bacher, Aaron J Molstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping Cell Identity from scRNA-seq: A primer on computational methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keshav MotwaniDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington.
Rhonda BacherDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida.
Aaron J MolstadDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida.

Funding

Resolving single-cell analysis challenges via data-driven decision frameworks and novel statistical methodsR35GM146895 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Rhonda Bacher · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Categorizing individual cells into one of many known cell type categories, also known as cell type annotation, is a critical step in the analysis of single-cell genomics data. The current process of annotation is time-intensive and subjective, which has led to different studies describing cell types with labels of varying degrees of resolution. While supervised learning approaches have provided automated solutions to annotation, there remains a significant challenge in fitting a unified model for multiple datasets with inconsistent labels. In this article, we propose a new multinomial logistic regression estimator which can be used to model cell type probabilities by integrating multiple datasets with labels of varying resolution. To compute our estimator, we solve a nonconvex optimization problem using a blockwise proximal gradient descent algorithm. We show through simulation studies that our approach estimates cell type probabilities more accurately than competitors in a wide variety of scenarios. We apply our method to ten single-cell RNA-seq datasets and demonstrate its utility in predicting fine resolution cell type labels on unlabeled data as well as refining cell type labels on data with existing coarse resolution annotations. Finally, we demonstrate that our method can lead to novel scientific insights in the context of a differential expression analysis comparing peripheral blood gene expression before and after treatment with interferon-

Indexed as

cell type annotationgroup lassoIntegrative analysismultinomial logistic regressionnonconvex optimizationsingle-cell genomics

Identifiers

PMID40206429
PMCPMC11981643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.