ArticleCase reports in women's health2025
Marginal resection preferred over radical resection for a large abdominal wall desmoid tumor during pregnancy: A case report.
Article in Case reports in women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Desmoid tumors are locally aggressive soft-tissue tumors known for their lack of metastatic potential but high recurrence rate after resection. Few cases of desmoid tumors during pregnancy have been reported, making treatment decisions more challenging. This report presents the case of a woman with an abdominal wall desmoid tumor resected at 17 weeks of gestation. The large mass (13.4 cm × 7.4 cm) was compressing the uterus, which necessitated surgical intervention. Marginal resection of the tumor was performed with microscopically positive margins. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and she had a normal vaginal delivery at 38 weeks. No recurrence of the tumor was observed at 24-month follow-up. This case represents the largest pregnancy-related abdominal desmoid tumor (22 cm × 12 cm) resected marginally during pregnancy. The procedure allowed for a vaginal delivery rather than a cesarean section. Surgical management of desmoid tumors in pregnancy should aim to remove the tumor while preserving function and anatomical integrity. While this approach is feasible for smaller tumors, larger tumors, as in this case, may result in loss of function and anatomical structure. This raises the question of whether marginal resection should be considered when preservation of function and structure is not feasible with radical resection. This case reinforces the fundamental surgical principle that when clear surgical margins cannot be achieved without compromising function and structure, marginal resection should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.