Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206708›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Mind the semantic gap: semantic efficiency in human computer interfaces.

James Horsley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James HorsleyAmazon Web Services, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As we become increasingly dependent on technology in our daily lives, the usability of HCIs is a key driver of individual empowerment for us all. A primary focus of AI systems has been to make HCIs easier to use by identifying what users need and agentively taking over some of the cognitive work users would have otherwise performed, as such, they are becoming our delegates. To become effective and reliable delegates, AI agents need to understand all relevant situational semantic context surrounding a user's need and how the tools of the HCI can be leveraged. Current ML systems have fundamental semantic gaps in bespoke human context, real-time world knowledge, and how those relate to HCI tooling. These challenges are difficult to close due factors such as privacy, continual learning, access to real-time context, and how deeply integrated the semantics are with in-context learning. As such, we need to research and explore new ways to safely capture, compactly model, and incrementally evolve semantics in ways that can efficiently integrate into how AI systems act on our behalf. This article presents a thought experiment called the Game of Delegation as a lens to view the effectiveness of delegation and the semantic efficiency with which the delegation was achieved.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegenerative AIhuman computer interfaces (HCI)information theoryretrieval augmented generationsemanticssemantic web

Identifiers

PMID40206708
PMCPMC11979188

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.