ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Employing bibliometrics and natural language processing (NLP) to analyse real-world applications of adverse drug reaction.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) pose significant health and economic burdens, yet underreporting and inconsistent standards persist. Digital health innovations, particularly mobile and web-based ADR reporting applications, offer potential to enhance pharmacovigilance by improving data accuracy and patient-reported outcomes. Objectives: The study provides a comprehensive mapping of ADR mobile and web application literature, analysing publication trends, key contributors, and core themes through bibliometric and NLP-based content analysis. Methods: A systematic two-stage approach was applied to 289 Web of Science articles on ADR reporting applications. Bibliometric analysis explored publication trends, co-authorship networks, and keyword occurrences, while NLP-based topic modelling identified prevalent themes, ensuring thematic coherence and interpretability. Results: Bibliometric analysis showed a rise in ADR application-related publications, primarily from the United Kingdom, United States of America, and Switzerland. Content analysis identified ten key themes, including pharmacovigilance, chemotherapy adherence, and psychiatry research. A distinct focus on digital tools in ADR reporting and management was evident, with keywords such as "mobile," "application," and "patient" becoming increasingly prominent in recent years. Co-authorship and collaboration networks, however, showed limited cross-national research partnerships. Discussion: The study highlights the transformative role of digital solutions in pharmacovigilance, demonstrating the potential of ADR applications to enhance reporting accuracy and improve patient safety. However, adoption remains early-stage and fragmented by regional affiliations. Future research should focus on patient-centric app development, effectiveness assessment, and fostering global collaboration. Strengthening digital literacy and robust investment in ADR reporting applications is crucial for optimizing their impact in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.