Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207172›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024

From Command to Care: A Scoping Review on Utilization of Smart Speakers by Patients and Providers.

Rishi Saripalle, Ravi Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rishi SaripalleSchool of Information Technology, Illinois State University, Normal, IL.
Ravi PatelSchool of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart speakers have gained considerable consumer adoption and research interests. Despite their innovative interaction capabilities, a notable void exists in the literature, with no comprehensive scoping review that scrutinizes and consolidates the usage of smart speakers by providers and patients. This study performed a scoping review to explore the standalone use of smart speakers in health settings, focusing on their potential to support providers and empower patients to manage their health and well-being. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search from January 2014-September 2023, using select keywords, was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, IEEE, ACM, JAMIA, Embase, CINHAL, EBSCO, and Cochrane. The literature search yielded 1546 articles, of which 59 met the inclusion criteria. The identified studies are categorized into helping patients (n=54) with themes of independent living, reducing loneliness and improving social life, aiding in patient self-care and self-management, promoting physical activity, rethinking health care and service delivery, remote patient monitoring and communication, health information queries and helping providers (n=24) with themes recording and accessing medical information, and reducing provider workload. These research studies, performed in a controlled environment with limited patients, have found smart speakers' high feasibility, acceptability, and positive reception in patient care and support providers. Furthermore, the findings showcase opportunities to leverage and challenges to address for a future of integrating and using smart speakers seamlessly in health settings.

Identifiers

PMID40207172
PMCPMC11975821

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.