ReviewMicrobiome research reports2025
The oncobiome; what, so what, now what?
Review in Microbiome research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fusobacterium periodonticum promotes colorectal tumorigenesis via decanoic acid-driven neutrophil chemotaxis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cutibacterium acnes-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Promote Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Progression by Activating the KEAP1-NRF2 Antioxidant Pathway to Suppress Ferroptosis.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Microbial Landscapes of the Gut-Biliary Axis: Implications for Benign and Malignant Biliary Tract Diseases.Microorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial communities inhabiting various body sites play critical roles in the initiation, progression, and treatment of cancer. The gut microbiota, a highly diverse microbial ecosystem, interacts with immune cells to modulate inflammation and immune surveillance, influencing cancer risk and therapeutic outcomes. Local tissue microbiota may impact the transition from premalignant states to malignancy. Characterization of the intratumoral microbiota increasingly reveals distinct microbiomes that may influence tumor growth, immune responses, and treatment efficacy. Various bacteria species have been reported to modulate cancer therapies through mechanisms such as altering drug metabolism and shaping the tumor microenvironment (TME). For instance, gut or intratumoral bacterial enzymatic activity can convert prodrugs into active forms, enhancing therapeutic effects or, conversely, inactivating small-molecule chemotherapeutics. Specific bacterial species have also been linked to improved responses to immunotherapy, underscoring the microbiome's role in treatment outcomes. Furthermore, unique microbial signatures in cancer patients, compared with healthy individuals, demonstrate the diagnostic potential of microbiota. Beyond the gut, tumor-associated and local microbiomes also affect therapy by influencing inflammation, tumor progression, and drug resistance. This review explores the multifaceted relationships between microbiomes and cancer, focusing on their roles in modulating the TME, immune activation, and treatment efficacy. The diagnostic and therapeutic potential of bacterial members of microbiota represents a promising avenue for advancing precision oncology and improving patient outcomes. By leveraging microbial biomarkers and interventions, new strategies can be developed to optimize cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.