ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
Prognostic value of the HFA-PEFF and H(2) FPEF scores for clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved ejection fraction.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors associated with high probability of pulmonary hypertension in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a significant risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). While the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scoring systems were developed to aid in the diagnosis of HFpEF, their predictive performance in patients with CAD remains underexplored. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation between January 2018 and October 2022. The study's primary endpoint was a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate time to adverse events, and differences between groups were analyzed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to assess the independent predictive value of the HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF scores for adverse outcomes. Results: The HFA-PEFF score categorized 65.7 % of patients as intermediate, 25.1 % as high, and 9.2 % as low probability for HFpEF. The H2FPEF score placed 77.3 % in the intermediate group, 19.3 % in the low, and 3.4 % in the high-probability group. The median follow-up period was 29 months. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression revealed the HFA-PEFF score was significantly associated with the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HR: 1.33, 95 % CI:1.07-1.65). Each point increase in the HFA-PEFF score raised heart failure hospitalization risk by 26 % (HR:1.26, 95 % CI: 1.05-1.51). In contrast, the H2FPEF score did not show a significant association with adverse events. Conclusions: The HFA-PEFF score demonstrated superior prognostic value for predicting adverse outcomes in CAD patients with preserved ejection fraction compared to the H2FPEF score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.