Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40207381›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2025

Nature-based interventions for older adults: a systematic review of intervention types and methods, health effects and pathways.

Ki Tong, Catharine Ward Thompson, Gail Carin-Levy, Jennifer Liddle, Sarah Morton, Gillian E Mead

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The forest as a health-promoting place-the meaning for seniors of playing padel in the forest: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multidimensional determinants of active and healthy aging trajectories: a position paper from the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ki TongEdinburgh College of Art, The University of Edinburgh, 74 Lauriston Pl, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK.
Catharine Ward ThompsonEdinburgh College of Art, The University of Edinburgh, 74 Lauriston Pl, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK.
Gail Carin-LevyOccupational Therapy and Arts Therapies, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Jennifer LiddlePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Sarah MortonMoray House School of Education and Sport Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Holyrood Rd, Edinburgh EH8 8AQ, UK.
Gillian E MeadUniversity of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Room S1642, Royal Infirmary, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNature-based interventions (NBIs) may support older adults' health and well-being, but it remains unclear which interventions are most effective, for whom and in which contexts. The existing Wilkie and Davinson framework explains the pathways between NBIs and health outcomes but underemphasises the effects of environmental qualities. Therefore, the study aims to critically examine existing NBIs and their associated health outcomes, with a focus on identifying the environmental qualities and pathways that are either facilitating or impeding.

methodsThe review sought 16 databases for any nature-based interventions aimed at enhancing health outcomes where participants are older adults aged ≥65. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed risk of bias. Narrative synthesis was used for result presentation.

resultsOf 6143 articles retrieved, 84 studies were included. Participants were primarily community dwelling without specific conditions. Most studies were quantitative experiments. Interventions were predominantly multicomponent, with restoring psychological capacities as the most common pathway. Spiritual, behavioural and socioecological changes were identified. Some health mechanisms were specific to outdoor interventions, but indoor interventions showed comparable outcomes.

conclusionsThe study predominantly included community-dwelling participants without specific health conditions, potentially limiting the generalisability of findings to older adults with multimorbidity or those in alternative living environments. Multicomponent interventions challenged direct associations between pathways and outcomes. Results extend existing frameworks by identifying spiritual, behavioural and socioecological benefits. Limited detailing of environmental qualities warrants further research to associate them with specific health outcomes. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024496114).

Indexed as

AgingHealthy AgingNatureAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHealth StatusHumansIndependent LivingMaleMental Healthgreenspacehealth and well-beingnature activitynature-based interventionsolder adultsolder peoplesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40207381
PMCPMC11982671

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.