ArticleHealth promotion international2025
Barriers and facilitators to implementing nature prescriptions for child and youth health: a scoping review.
Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a park and green space service classification to support park prescribing in Korea.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Nature and the mind: Towards nature-based mental health care and prevention.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- From prescription to practice: improving patient access and adherence to nature-based clinical interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Managing Late and Long-Term Effects Among Swedish Adolescents and Young Adults Affected by Cancer Following a Wilderness Intervention: Reconnecting with Self and Meaning Through Nature's Unconditional Presence - A Qualitative Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spending time in and connecting with nature has been shown to have positive benefits across multiple health outcomes, including for children and youth. Growing in popularity, nature prescriptions are recommended by health providers, social providers, and educators to spend more time in nature. The health and well-being benefits from nature prescription programs hold great potential for children and youth. However, a key evidence gap remains on how nature prescriptions occur in practice in pediatric healthcare, social care, and education, including barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nature prescription programs. The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of nature prescription programs for child and youth health. Peer-reviewed, original studies published in English were systematically searched in six databases using search terms focusing on nature prescriptions and child and youth health. Following the recommendations of Arksey and O'Malley (2005), two reviewers independently screened 2111 titles and abstracts, 38 records were screened in full text, and 10 studies were included. Thematic analysis was conducted following Braun and Clarke's (2022) guidelines. Three themes were developed from thematic analysis: (i) safety considerations, (ii) materials, resources, and support, and (iii) program features. The results of this review can be used to guide future nature prescription program implementation strategies for child and youth health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.