ArticleHuman genetics2025
The molecular landscape of hereditary ataxia: a single-center study.
Article in Human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trends and Disparities in Mortality from Hereditary Ataxia in United States, 2000-2020: A Retrospective Analysis with Projections to 2050.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hereditary ataxia (HA) is a heterogeneous group of complex neurological disorders, which represent a diagnostic challenge due to their diverse phenotypes and genetic etiologies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the field of neurogenetics, improving the identification of ataxia-associated genes. Notwithstanding, repeat expansions analysis remains a cornerstone in the diagnostic workflow of these diseases. Here we describe the molecular characterization of a consecutive single-center series of 70 patients with genetically uncharacterized HA. Patients' samples were analyzed for known HA-associated repeat expansions as first tier and negative ones were analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) as second tier. Overall, we identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 40% (n = 28/70) and variants of unknown significance (VUS) in 20% (n = 14/70) of cases. In particular, 10 patients (14.3%, n = 10/70) presented pathogenic repeat expansions while 18 cases (30%, n = 18/60) harbored at least a single nucleotide variant (SNV) or a copy number variant (CNV) in HA or HSP-related genes. WES allowed assessing complex neurological diseases (i.e., leukodystrophies, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis and atypical xeroderma pigmentosum), which are not usually referred as pure genetic ataxias. Our data suggests that the combined use of repeat expansion analysis and WES, coupled to detailed clinical phenotyping, is able to detect the molecular alteration underpinning ataxia in almost 50% cases, regardless of the hereditary pattern. Indeed, NGS-based tests are fundamental to acknowledge novel HA-associated genes useful to explain the remaining wide fraction of negative tests. Nowadays, this gap is problematic since these patients could not benefit from an etiological diagnosis of their disease that allows prognostic trajectories and prenatal/preimplantation diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.