Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208441›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025

Assessment of the physicochemical characteristics of by-products of cassava processing and their effects on biodiversity.

S A Olaniyan, J B Hussein, M O Oke, B A Akinwande, T S Workneh, M Ayodele, I A Adeyemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S A OlaniyanDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food and Consumer Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, P.M.B. 4000, Oyo State, Nigeria.
J B HusseinDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Modibbo Adama University, Yola, P.M.B. 2076, Adamawa State, Nigeria. jbhussein01@mau.edu.ng.
M O OkeDepartment Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, P.M.B. 4000, Oyo State, Nigeria.
B A AkinwandeDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food and Consumer Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, P.M.B. 4000, Oyo State, Nigeria.
T S WorknehDepartment of Bioresources Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg, 3209, Scottsville, South Africa.
M AyodeleInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, PMB 5320, Oyo State, Nigeria.
I A AdeyemiDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Food and Consumer Sciences, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, P.M.B. 4000, Oyo State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cassava offers by-products of processing such as peels and effluents, which seldom are disposed of without proper treatments. These by-products are rich in organic matter and cyanogenic compounds, which can be potentially hazardous to the environment. For sustainable waste management and ecological balance, a systematic investigation was carried out to analyse the physicochemical properties of cassava peels and effluents and their effects on biodiversity. Standard methods were utilised to analyse these parameters. The results for the effluents ranged from 3.41-3.81 for pH, 2467.10-3630.97 mg/L for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD

Indexed as

BiodiversityEnvironmental MonitoringManihotWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater Pollutants, ChemicalCassavaCyanidePhysicochemical propertiesRural communityWastes

Identifiers

PMID40208441
PMCPMC11985625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.