Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40208633›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Machine stability and dosimetry for ultra-high dose rate FLASH radiotherapy human clinical protocol.

Patrik Gonçalves Jorge, Reiner Geyer, Rémy Kinj, Luis Schiappacasse, Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi, Jean Bourhis, Fernanda Herrera, François Bochud, Claude Bailat, Raphaël Moeckli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patrik Gonçalves JorgeInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-934X
Reiner GeyerInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rémy KinjDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Luis SchiappacasseDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Wendy Jeanneret-SozziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean BourhisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fernanda HerreraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
François BochudInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claude BailatInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Raphaël MoeckliInstitute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Biltema donationFondation pour le soutien de la recherche et du développement de l'oncologie (FSRDO)IntraOp Medical CorporationISREC Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe FLASH effect, induced by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiations, offers the potential to spare normal tissue while effectively treating tumors. It is important to achieve precise and accurate dose delivery and to establish reliable detector systems, particularly for clinical trials needed to help the clinical transfer of FLASH-Radiotherapy (FLASH-RT). However, the use of monitoring chambers with UHDR beams is presently limited, leading to the reliance on passive dosimetry and machine stability. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the energy and output stability of a UHDR Mobetron (IntraOp, USA) and to compare it with its conventional dose rate (CDR) mode. Furthermore, we assessed the dosimetric accuracy of a human clinical protocol for FLASH-RT.

methodsOver a 26-month duration, we assessed the short- and long-term stability of the output and energy of the Mobetron system. Daily checks were conducted for 9 MeV CDR and UHDR. In parallel, the IMPulse clinical trial involving patients with skin metastases from melanoma was initiated. Prescription doses ranging from 22 to 28 Gy were administered. Pre-, post-, and in vivo dosimetry using alanine and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) was performed and compared to the prescription doses.

resultsShort-term output fluctuations remained below 0.6 % and 1 % for 9 MeV CDR and UHDR, respectively. Long-term output fluctuations were within 2 % and the long-term energy fluctuations were below 2 mm (R

conclusionsThe Mobetron system demonstrated favorable short- and long-term stability. There was a good agreement between the prescribed and the measured dose for the clinical IMPulse trial. The stability of this UHDR machine allows us to effectively conduct human clinical protocols as well as preclinical experiments, even in the absence of a real-time monitoring system.

Indexed as

MelanomaPhantoms, ImagingRadiometryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedSkin NeoplasmsClinical ProtocolsHumansRadiotherapy DosagedosimetryFLASHmonitoringreproducibilitystabilityUHDRultra‐high dose rate

Identifiers

PMID40208633
PMCPMC12148758

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.