ArticleDiabetes care2025
Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Among Asian Individuals With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the U.S., 2016-2021.
Article in Diabetes care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus evidence from Asia countries: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) differs among race and ethnic groups with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Heterogeneity in APOs may be masked by aggregating these groups. We assessed whether the frequency and risk of APOs differed among Asian groups with GDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis is a serial cross-sectional analysis of U.S. birth certificate data (2016-2021) from individuals with a singleton first livebirth. The exposure was self-reported maternal race and ethnicity stratified by Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese versus non-Hispanic White as the reference. Maternal outcomes included: primary cesarean delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), intensive care unit admission, and transfusion. Neonatal outcomes included large-for-gestational-age (LGA), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.
resultsThe study population included 29,370 Indian, 16,146 Chinese, 9,082 Filipino, 6,497 Vietnamese, 3,754 Korean, and 1,253 Japanese individuals, and 254,433 White individuals. Between 2016 and 2021, the frequency of HDP, but not other APOs, increased among most Asian groups. In multivariable analyses, individuals in all Asian groups had higher likelihood of SGA and lower likelihood of LGA compared with White individuals. Findings for other APOs were heterogeneous. The risk of APOs was generally highest among Filipino individuals, followed by Indian individuals, and lowest among Chinese individuals among Asian groups.
conclusionsThere was significant heterogeneity in the frequency and risk of APOs among Asian individuals with GDM in the U.S. Disaggregation of the Asian population in diabetes and pregnancy research and surveillance is necessary to identify opportunities for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.