ArticleScientific reports2025
Baseline abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila and Bacteroides acidifaciens in a healthy state predicts inflammation associated tumorigenesis in the AOM/DSS mouse model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota-driven pre-metastatic niche formation in colorectal cancer liver metastasis: mechanisms and translational significance.Gut pathogens · 2026Review
- Gut dysbiosis in a murine model of cutaneous lupus erythematosus correlates with antigen-specific T cells and antigen-presenting cells in skin.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The effect of Akkermansia in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Investigating the role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Mechanistic pathways predictive modeling and translational interventions for radiation enteritis in cervical cancer radiotherapy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Numerous studies demonstrate that intestinal microbiota contribute to colorectal cancer (CRC), which is often associated with dysbiosis. Most of the data were obtained from studies on CRC patients, making it challenging to determine whether alterations in microbiota are a consequence of the pathology or whether they actively drive its progression. Several studies using laboratory animals suggest that gut microbiota may be involved in both the onset and progression of CRC. In the present study we utilized the azoxymethane-dextran sulfate sodium (AOM/DSS) mouse model of CRC to investigate the contribution of healthy-state microbiota to inflammation-associated tumorigenesis. Two cohorts of C57BL/6 mice harboring different intestinal microbiota demonstrated different susceptibility to AOM/DSS treatment. Sequencing of 16S rRNA bacterial DNA from fecal samples revealed Akkermansia muciniphila and Bacteroides acidifaciens as marker features in the healthy-state microbiota (before AOM/DSS administration), which showed a strong positive correlation with tumor incidence. Moreover, the healthy-state abundance of these markers, considered beneficial bacteria, was strongly positively correlated with the sulfate-reducing bacteria Desulfovibrio fairfieldensis identified as a marker of chronic colitis-associated microbiota. Furthermore, the abundances of these marker features, associated with CRC outcome, correlated with the expression of interferon gamma and nitric oxide synthase 2 genes in colon tissue during the early stage of DSS-induced intestinal inflammation. In contrast to multiple studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory properties of A. muciniphila and B. acidifaciens, our results point out their potential adverse effect under specific conditions of genotoxicity and inflammation in the intestine. Taken together, our findings suggest a complex, context-dependent role of commensal microbiota in inflammation-associated dysbiosis and CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.