ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: Where Are We Today?
Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are Traditional Registries Becoming Obsolete in the Modern Digital Health Ecosystem?Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Patient experience data in formulary decision-making: Payer-reported perceptions and use.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Level of health technology assessment process-related skills among doctors in Croatia: a cross-sectional survey study.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Editorial: Increasing importance of patients-generated real world data for healthcare policy decisions about medicinal products: volume III.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Authentic content as an effective mechanism for embedding patient voices in health innovation: a hypothesis and conceptual framework.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Patient Knowledge and Adherence to Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: Findings from an Observational Study in Italian Tertiary Care Hospitals.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of patient participation in health technology assessment systems worldwide: trends and practices.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A hierarchical and configurational analysis of Health Technology Assessment outcomes for cell and gene therapies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs healthcare stakeholders aim to support patient-centered care, patients play an increasingly important role in pharmaceutical and medical technology development and healthcare decision-making. Patient engagement (PE), patient experience data (PED), and meaningful integration of PE to enrich PED have been evolving rapidly. This landscape review focuses on emerging PE/PED practices and guidelines in 2023.
methodsReferences published between January-December 2023 on the use of PE and PED from health technology assessment (HTA) and regulatory bodies in different countries, three peer-reviewed journals, and referred resources from collaborators were analyzed. These references were compared with those in our previous publication (August 2021-January 2023, 17-month period).
resultsOverall, 28 references from HTA/regulatory bodies, 26 from peer-reviewed articles, and 17 referred resources were identified. Eight references on PE and PED integration (PE + PED) were identified in 2023 from HTA/regulatory bodies, compared with none in the previous 17-month analysis. Emerging trends on the role of PE, PED, and real-world evidence in HTA/regulatory deliberations, transparency and geographic variations in the use of such evidence and practices, and gaps thereof have been highlighted.
conclusionsThe increase in PE, PED, and PE + PED references worldwide in 2023 versus the prior 17-month analysis suggests accelerated adoption of PE + PED practices. However, a need remains for comprehensive, actionable guidance on best practices for use of PE and PED for harmonization and incorporation into HTA/regulatory processes. Patient input-essential for evidence-based decision-making-provides valuable insights that enhance care quality, treatment relevance and effectiveness, and builds trust and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.