Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40210892›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimal nitrogen rates and clonal effects on cannabinoid yields of medicinal cannabis.

Enrico Dilena, Ian Hunt, Dugald C Close

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enrico DilenaTasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA), University of Tasmania, Life Sciences Building, Level 2, College Rd, Sandy Bay, TAS, 7005, Australia. enrico.dilena@utas.edu.au.
Ian HuntBioSS, Edinburgh University, James Clerk Maxwell Building, Peter Guthrie Tate Road, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Dugald C CloseTasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA), University of Tasmania, Life Sciences Building, Level 2, College Rd, Sandy Bay, TAS, 7005, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) nutrition and germplasm of clones can influence biomass and cannabinoid concentration in medicinal cannabis. However, there are discrepancies on the optimal nitrogen (N) application rate at the flowering stage to achieve maximum yield and if, or how, this interacts with clones from different seed lines of the same genotype. This research examined the relationship between N application rate, concentration of cannabinoids and biomass yield of a CBD-type medicinal cannabis cultivar in clones propagated from five different seed lines (hereafter referred to as clones). Clonal rooted cuttings were propagated from five mother plants germinated from seeds of cultivar 'Tas1'. Five N levels (30, 90, 160, 240 and 400 mg/L N) were imposed at the start of the inflorescence period and continued until harvest eight weeks later. Some pollen contamination occurred during the trial so that seed biomass was assessed for each plant and included in statistical analysis. Weight of total biomass, leaves and inflorescence (from upper and lower canopy positions), N%, and cannabinoid concentrations were measured after the harvest. Results indicated that increasing N supply generated a clear upward trend in inflorescence biomass that peaked at 160 mg/L N after which it did not significantly change, while leaf biomass steadily increased with N. Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations decreased significantly with increasing N concentration in leaves with a similar, but non-significant, trend for inflorescences. The CBD to THC ratio increased with increased N. Clone source was strongly correlated with cannabinoid concentration, but not leaf, inflorescence or total biomass, across all N treatments. Clones 13 and 27 developed greater cannabinoid concentrations relative to clones 18 and 26 irrespective of N treatment. Pollen contamination induced seed development that comprised up to 5% of inflorescence biomass dry weight but this did not significantly affect whole-plant biomass, N accumulation (N%), or cannabinoid concentration. These findings provide valuable insights for improving cannabinoid yield in this widely cultivated plant species.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsCannabisMedical MarijuanaNitrogenPlants, MedicinalBiomassInflorescencePlant LeavesSeedsCannabinoidsMedical MarijuanaNitrogenCBDFertigationInflorescenceNitrogen nutritionPollen contaminationTHC

Identifiers

PMID40210892
PMCPMC11985917

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.