Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40211167›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Assessing concordance between RNA-Seq and NanoString technologies in Ebola-infected nonhuman primates using machine learning.

Mostafa Rezapour, Aarthi Narayanan, Wyatt H Mowery, Metin Nafi Gurcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Machine Learning in Nonhuman Primate Models of Infectious Diseases: Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial Intelligence in Bulk RNA-Seq: Challenges and Potential Solutions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mostafa RezapourCenter for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA. mrezapou@wakehealth.edu.
Aarthi NarayananDepartment of Biology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA.
Wyatt H MoweryDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Metin Nafi GurcanCenter for Artificial Intelligence Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA.

Funding

U.S. Government under HDTRA 12310003, "Host signaling mechanisms contributing to endothelial damage in hemorrhagic fever virus infection," PI: Narayanan HDTRA 12310003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the concordance between RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and NanoString technologies for gene expression analysis in non-human primates (NHPs) infected with Ebola virus (EBOV). A detailed comparison of both platforms revealed a strong correlation, with Spearman coefficients for 56 out of 62 samples ranging from 0.78 to 0.88. The mean and median coefficients were 0.83 and 0.85, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed high consistency across most measurements, with values falling within the 95% limits of agreement. Using a machine learning approach with the Supervised Magnitude-Altitude Scoring (SMAS) method trained on NanoString data, OAS1 was identified as a key gene signature for distinguishing RT-qPCR positive from negative samples. Remarkably, when used as the sole predictor in a logistic regression model, OAS1 maintained its predictive power on RNA-Seq data from the same cohort of EBOV-infected NHPs, achieving 100% accuracy in distinguishing infected from non-infected samples. OAS1 was also tested in a completely independent held-out test set, consisting of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) isolated and infected with different strains of the Ebola virus: wild-type (wt), VP35m, VP24m, along with a double mutant VP35m & VP24m, and again demonstrated a 100% accuracy rate in differentiating EBOV-infected from mock-infected samples, confirming its effectiveness as a predictive marker across diverse experimental setups and virus strains. Further differential expression analysis across both platforms identified 12 common genes (including ISG15, OAS1, IFI44, IFI27, IFIT2, IFIT3, IFI44L, MX1, MX2, OAS2, RSAD2, and OASL) that showed the highest levels of statistical significance and biological relevance. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis confirmed the involvement of these genes in key immune and viral infection pathways, highlighting their importance in EBOV infection. RNA-Seq uniquely identified genes such as CASP5, USP18, and DDX60, which are important in immune regulation and antiviral defense and were not detected by NanoString, demonstrating the broader detection capabilities of RNA-Seq. This study indicates a very strong agreement between RNA-Seq and NanoString platforms in gene expression analysis, with RNA-Seq displaying broader capabilities in identifying gene signatures.

Indexed as

EbolavirusHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaMachine LearningRNA-Seq2',5'-Oligoadenylate SynthetaseAnimalsDendritic CellsGene Expression ProfilingHumans2',5'-Oligoadenylate SynthetaseConcordance analysisGene expression analysisMachine learningNanoString technologyRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID40211167
PMCPMC11983957

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.