ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Urobiome of patients with diabetic kidney disease in different stages is revealed by 2bRAD-M.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated analysis of the aqueous humor microbiome and lens capsule transcriptome in high myopia cataract: a pilot study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Renal tissue microbiota and metabolite profiling reveal dysregulated signatures in diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Gut microbial-derived metabolites: key players in kidney disease and renal fibrosis.International journal of biological sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge of the urinary microbiome (urobiome) in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains limited. The most commonly used 16S rRNA sequencing technique can only provide bacterial identification at the genus level. As a novel technique, 2bRAD sequencing for microbiome (2bRAD-M) can be used to identify the low-biomass microbiome at the species level. In this study, we used 2bRAD-M to compare the urobiome composition of patients with DKD at different stages with healthy individuals and those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with the expectation that we would find discriminative species correlated with DKD.
methodHealthy controls, patients with DKD with microalbuminuria (DKD1 group) or macroalbuminuria (DKD2 group), and patients with T2DM were recruited (n = 20 for each group). The first-morning urine was collected for 2bRAD-M testing. The albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was also measured with urine samples. Serum samples were collected for detecting clinical indicators. The microbial diversity and composition based on abundance were calculated. Differential bacteria for different groups were identified. Besides, the correlation between discriminative bacteria and clinical indices was also analyzed.
resultsUrobiome diversity was significantly reduced in the DKD groups. In the DKD1 group, was the dominant genus, followed by Pseudomonas_E, whereas in the DKD2 group, Pseudomonas_E became the dominant genus and Escherichia was notably reduced. Both Bifidobacterium and Streptococcus, which were the top genera in the control group, were substantially decreased in the DKD groups. The discriminative species for DKD1 included Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter johnsonii, while for DKD2, Pseudomonas_E oleovorans, Enterococcus faecalis, and Morganella morganii were identified. Pseudomonas_E, Enterococcus and Morganella showed a strong correlation with renal function indicators and urinary protein levels.
conclusionThe urobiome diversity and composition in patients with DKD were markedly different from those in healthy individuals and T2DM patients. These findings provide valuable insights into the onset and progression of DKD, driven by changes in the urinary bacterial community structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.