ReviewImplementation science communications2025
The use of patient and public involvement and engagement in the design and conduct of implementation research: a scoping review.
Review in Implementation science communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to co-create context-sensitive analyses of health service experiences: proposed guidelines for contextualist collaborative thematic analyses with co-researchers.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in methodological research: exploring challenges, tensions and learning from the perspectives of PPIE and researchers in the Realist Economic Evaluation Methods (REEM) study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- From tokenism to togetherness: the V.O.I.C.E. framework for safety-centred lived experience involvement in perinatal and parenting research.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Performance of large language models as a source of clinical information on bacteriophage therapy.Npj viruses · 2026Article
- Co-designing the 'Empower Community Health' programme: A capacity-building initiative to support community health workers' non-communicable disease health promotion in Ethiopia.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Reducing tokenism in patient and public involvement by integrating the Gothenburg person-centred care framework, relational bridges and impact log - a co-produced position paper.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Tensions in patient involvement and engagement in health research and development: a qualitative interview study with key actors.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Perception of physiotherapy researchers about patient and public involvement in health research design and planning in Nigeria.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Evaluating Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Activity Within the 3DPiPPIn Trial: A Qualitative Exploration of Contributors' Perspectives on Their Impact.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- A rapid evaluation of the reporting and publishing practices of patient and public involvement and engagement in health research within a UK university institute.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Outcome measures used in the conservative management of people with non-specific thoracic spine pain (NTSP): a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Diabetes Action Canada (DAC) Research-To-Action Fellowship Program for Patient Partners: A Multi-Method Case Study.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- The Integrated Knowledge, Dissemination, and Action Framework: A Model for Community-Engaged Translation, Dissemination, and Action.Health promotion practice · 2025Article
- Navigating qualitative methods choices in dissemination and implementation research.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Involving consumers in health research through the use of consumer panels: a scoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
- Proactive planning for contextual fit: the role of the implementation premortem.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of Patient and Public Involvement in Implementation Research using the Study of Implementation of Midwifery Continuity of Carer (SIMCA).NIHR open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMost implementation research focuses on understanding and changing health professionals' work practices. While Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in applied health research is recognised as best practice, and is often a requirement for funders globally, little is known about the role of patients and the public in implementation research.
methodsGuided by Arksey and O'Malley's framework, we conducted a scoping review to categorise PPIE in the design and conduct of implementation research, including how patients and the public have been involved, the reported impact of patient and public involvement, and the reported benefits and challenges to involving patients and the public in implementation research. We searched four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. To be included, studies had to report some form of PPIE in the design and conduct of implementation research. Information about each study was extracted using a structured data extraction form. Data was collated and summarised.
resultsOf the 535 unique records identified, 12 were included. Analysis of the eligible studies found eight different types of PPIE activities. Researchers mostly consulted with patients and members of the public via feedback sessions, committee representation and roundtable discussions. Barriers and enablers were usually researcher related and their attempts to build, maintain, and negotiate relationships with public contributors over time. Resources and financial remuneration were also key. Most studies (n = 7) reported that engaging community members in the design and implementation of community-based programs and trials enhanced cultural appropriateness, and the likelihood of sustainability. However, there was little formal evaluation of the use of PPIE.
conclusionThis study can be used to design and guide future PPIE in implementation research. Given the inconsistent, and often absent, reporting of PPIE activities and barriers and enablers across the included studies, future studies should describe and evaluate the execution of PPIE in implementation research to advance practices in this field. REGISTRATION: The review was registered on Research Registry (reviewregistry1552).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.